I do it manually, and it could be automated. My typical rhythm: follow up on day 2 around 6 p.m., when people get home from work.
Success rate: about 10% of follow-ups result in a purchase. Always better than nothing.
Itâs just a personal opinion, but I would be afraid it would alienate those who donât follow up. In any case, I know that on my end I donât really like being pushed to buy (but on the other hand, Iâm not really the type to send offers into the void).
I only restart once, never again. And very gently.
Not yet, but itâs part of upcoming features ![]()
Hello, Iâm jumping on the « while itâs hot » bandwagon. Does the automatic response to offers launch correctly manually? Whatâs the difference compared to responding ourselves if weâre afraid of missing out on an impulsive purchase? If Iâm asleep and miss a buyerâs offer, unfortunately, if I log on to the PC 2 hours later, whether I respond myself or with clemz, Iâll have missed the buyerâs « hot » moment, wonât I?
The response launches automatically as long as the computer doesnât go to sleep. So also when youâre sleeping
.
Okay, I thought it had to be launched manually! Thanks to you
Except that it is strongly advised not to use automations at night or at least from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. ![]()
Unless you sleep during the day⊠then thatâs another matter ![]()
Jokes aside, @Scotti_Az
The idea of automating messages to favorites is to do it for you, but with the illusion that itâs you sending the messages (not spamming or doing it when you usually sleep)
If you have favorites from time to time.
Do it by hand indeed⊠on the other hand, if you start to have tens or even hundreds of favorites per day, use automation, and be careful to manage the number well because itâs quickly saturated (the quota) ![]()
After youâll complain again to @Clement that there arenât enough messages to send in his formulas
![]()
By the way, I think the number of messages that can be sent to favorites has increased, right?
Yessss, I noticed it too! Thanks Clemz ![]()
Yes!
Thanks for noticing ![]()
Automated offers count as messages, (The 1st message of a counter offer, not the whole conversation) so weâve increased the thresholds.
thanks
, thatâs good
After a few times of using it, a new benefit emerges. I have a rule of never granting a discount of more than 20%. I design my initial prices anticipating this 20%.
I have configured offer responses to accept -10% or make a counter-offer of -10%. And often, people who proposed -20% end up buying at -10% only, whereas before automation I would have accepted their -20%. Thus, automating offers allows one to discipline themselves in price reductions.
Itâs excellent.
And it gives them the illusion that they got a good deal by getting a discount ![]()
Yes. I also reason in terms of « face ». Asking for a discount and being definitively refused means losing face, and undoubtedly buyers give up on the transaction, even if there is no better offer elsewhere. Whereas being granted at least a little something allows one to save face.